Why dajjal is not mentioned in quran

As is this looks more likely like a comment with an unproved claim. Hanafi Hikari Hanafi Hikari 1 2 2 bronze badges. Welcome to Islam SE. Answers should be elaborate and focused on addressing the question. Claims should be supported by evidence. Please visit our tour in the help center , and refer to How to Answer. The opinion of a single person not substantiated by opinions of scholars over the centuries is not considered evidence.

Would it be possible to be more specific as to what Sheikh Imran N. Hosein says i. Hosein, the word Jasad in the ayat above refers to Dajjal. This is a new finding of the ayat so the scholars over the centuries had not made a tafsir as convincing as this one from him. This is not the only new finding in the Quran, there's a lot more from him.

Sheikh Imran N. As he is a philosopher specializing in the Islamic estacology, please watch his lectures and read his books. Show 1 more comment. Coat Shaker Coat Shaker 1 2 2 bronze badges. Featured on Meta. Now live: A fully responsive profile.

Version labels for answers. Related 4. Hot Network Questions. His spiritual destruction can only be healed spiritually. In addition, let us mention here that the Islamic scholars take the examples in the Quran like Taghoot, Jalut and Samiri as prototypes of the Dajjal. As is seen, Dajjal is not mentioned in the Quran explicitly. However, there are many verses indicating him. Scholars describe the reason why Dajjal is not explicitly mentioned in the Quran as follows: There are two main sources of Islam.

The first is the Quran, and second is the sunnah the way of prophet Muhammad. Though Dajjal is not mentioned in Quran explicitly, it is mentioned in many hadiths explicitly. Sometimes it is not needed to mention apparent things for a second time. Skip to main content. Create new account.

Log in. Log in Create new account Random Question. Random Question. I want to ask a question. However, if we try to find the difference between the Dajjaal Antichrist and Gog and Magog , we come to realize that the first is a Fitnah to people's religiosity and faith but will not cause the destruction of the earth or affect people's lives.

On the contrary, Gog and Magog shall cause evident harm on people's lives, as they will destroy everything in their way; however, no one will turn to disbelief because of them. Then a people whom Allah will have protected from him the Dajjaal will come to Jesus, and he will wipe their faces and inform them of their ranks in Paradise, and it is under such conditions that Allah will reveal these words to Jesus: 'I have brought forth from amongst My servants such people against whom none will be able to fight Moreover, the Dajjaal will appear before Gog and Magog are let loose.

As for the other verse in which Gog and Magog are mentioned, it was part of the story of Thul-Qarnayn and was not specifically about them. Another reason worthy of highlighting here is that Allah, The Exalted, decreed that the Dajjaal will not appear until people have forgotten him.

Therefore, it was more appropriate that the Dajjaal would not be explicitly mentioned in the Quran. The beginning of the verse talks about the Quran. It is speaking of the Quran. You MUST agree with this as any honest person would. That clearly means that the message include ONLY these verses. Nothing else. What does that verse tell you??!!!!

Does that sound like Allah wants you to follow something else besides these verses Quran. How could any honest person possibly say so!!!

I don't understand! Does this verse seriously leave any room for hadith an alternate revelation?? There is no Dajjal. BlackMuslim's double facepalm picture is an embarrassment to Islam and this forum. Please do not engage in actions like this. The only embarrassment is in your inability to understand basic logic of Also in your cowardice of not answering whatever kills your claims shoving it aside as if it's nothing and then ranting "The verse is clear!

You're unwilling! Yeah yeah , call it emotional rant. As if saying I'm an embarrassment is most logical.